Crime Topics Menu
Doogue & O'Brien Testimonials
"I don't think I could have coped if I lost my trial. The preparation you put in was amazing."
Gary F
"I was proud that we stood up and fought the charges. I would have lost everything if I had been found guilty."
Peter L
"Your compassion during my time of need was outstanding. Many thanks."
Cameron A
"Lots of people kept telling me I should plead guilty except for your firm. You were right."
Lee W
"Everyone was judging me except for you. That support really helped me get through a terrible time."
John A
Sexual penetration child under 16 years County Court Plea
Sexual penetration child under 16 years County Court Plea
ADLA member for - VIC
Written by
Paul McClure
Criminal Defence Lawyer
Sexual Offences
A Case Study: Sexual penetration child under 16 years, County Court Plea
28542
The Name of the Offence
Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
Place of the event - Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
Heathcote
The court attended - Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
Bendigo County Court
Acting Solicitor: Paul McClure
Facts of the Case - Sexual penetration of a child under 16 years
The client was charged with sexual penetration of a child under 16 years, as well as indecent act with a child under 16 years. The client and the complainant were step-brothers. The offending occurred when the client was aged 13 to 14 years of age, and the complainant aged 8 to 9 years. Because the complainant was aged under 10 years at the time of the offending, the maximum penalty is 25 years' imprisonment. The offending alleged included oral sex, anal penetration, and masturbation.
Results Achieved
The client was aged 19 at the time of sentencing. He had had no subsequent Court appearances since the offending occurred. He was employed full time and undertaking an apprenticeship. His parents were supportive of him, and he had engaged in psychological treatment to deal with issues of depression, anxiety, and anger relating to the pending Court process. The Judge was of the opinion that he had good prospects of rehabilitation, given his lack of subsequent Court appearances and his age; he was also of the opinion that he ought not interfere with his employment as an apprentice. He received a total effective sentence of 14 months, which was wholly suspended for 2 years. Given his age at the time of the offending, the Judge exercised his discretion in not placing the client on the Sex Offenders Register.
Article published on 01/09/2009. To check if any changes to the law please discuss with one of our lawyers.
